Re-read act 3 from page 75 (I think that…) to the end. How effective might an audience find this extract as an ending to the play?
Towards the end of the play we see that roles have reversed between Carol and John. In act 1, at the beginning of the play Carol goes to John for help as she find it’s difficult to understand John’s book and she is failing the course. However, implications are caused in act 3 when Carol explains to John that she wants to ban his book. ‘’We want it removed from inclusion as a representative example of the university.’’ The fact that Carol says ‘’we’’ shows that she is talking on behalf of her group and not just herself, this changes the idea of a student teacher relationship because Carol has brought it to a more of a personal level by trying to ban his book. The way that John reacts to this is in a more emotional way, this is shown by the capitalisation of the word ‘’look,’’ and also seems to get frustrated with Carol as he is trying to help solve the problems that she has with John, ‘’I’m reading all your demands. All right!?’’ shows the frustration in John’s voice, it is almost as if John just wants Carol to get off his back just so he can get his head around Carol wanting to ban his book. You can see clearly that the tone in John’s voice soon changes when he says ‘’Get the fuck out of my office.’’ John has become more angered now rather than emotional with Carol’s complaint, yet Carol still seems to be a lot more confident in the way she is speaking at the beginning of the play. In act 1 John would always talk over Carol, and almost not give her chance to speak what she thought and John would over power her and dominate the conversation. But now the roles have reversed and it is John who is in the emotional position and carol is dominant in the way she speaks and this is seen in the language that is used throughout act 3. On page you can see how tension is suddenly built, John tells Carol that he has not been home for...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document